The National Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Natural History Study

Note that you will be prompted to log in or register an account

Accession Number
HLB03112626a

Study Type
Epidemiology Study

Collection Type
Open BioLINCC Study See bottom of this webpage for request information

Study Period
June 2016 – December 2025

NHLBI Division
DBDR

Dataset(s) Last Updated
August 5, 2026

Clinical Trial URLs
NCT02775383

Primary Publication URLs
41671442

Consent

Commercial Use Data Restrictions No

Data Restrictions Based On Area Of Research No

Commercial Use Specimen Restrictions No

Non-Genetic Use Specimen Restrictions Based On Area Of Use No

Genetic Use Of Specimens Allowed? Yes

Genetic Use Area Of Research Restrictions No

Objectives

The goal of the National MDS Study was to establish a publicly available resource to facilitate the study of the natural history of MDS. This was accomplished through: 1) Creation of a rich, multi-institutional clinical database associated with a longitudinal biorepository of consistently processed blood and bone marrow specimens collected prospectively from participants with MDS and participants with precursor conditions such as idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS), idiopathic dysplasia of undetermined significance (IDUS) and clonal cytopenia of indeterminant significance (CCUS); [ND1.1]and 2) Support for investigator-initiated studies of MDS that will have high-impact for MDS patients, including basic science, clinical, health outcomes and epidemiological research. The design of the study is described in https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1616186

Background

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a spectrum of heterogeneous hematopoietic stem cell disorders, vary in clinical severity, response to therapy, and propensity toward progression to acute myeloid leukemia. These acquired clonal disorders result from somatic mutations within the hematopoietic stem or progenitor cell population. Understanding the natural history and the risk of developing adverse outcomes or myeloid leukemia is dependent on access to well-annotated biospecimens linked to robust clinical and molecular data. To facilitate the acquisition and distribution of MDS biospecimens to the wider scientific community and support scientific discovery in this disease, the National MDS Natural History study was initiated in 2016 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and was conducted in collaboration with VA hospitals and medical centers supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Participants

Patients with suspected MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) overlap disorder, who were either undergoing diagnostic workup and bone marrow assessments or newly diagnosed with MDS within the past 6-months and undergoing clinical evaluation and bone marrow assessments to confirm MDS or evaluate disease status, were enrolled across 161 centers. Participants were required to be 18 years or older; have no prior treatment of MDS at entry and through time of the entry bone marrow aspirate; no treatment with hematopoietic growth factors in prior 6 months; no diagnosis of a solid tumor or hematologic malignancy within two years prior to enrollment except for in situ cancer of the skin (basal or squamous cell), cervix, bladder, breast or prostate; no treatment with radiation therapy in the two years prior to registration; no non-hormonal treatment for malignancy within the two years prior to registration; no established hereditary bone marrow failure syndrome; no known primary diagnosis of aplastic anemia, classical paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenic purpura, or large granular lymphocyte leukemia; and not enrolled in the Connect MDS/Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Disease Registry. A total of 2,115 participants were enrolled into the study with 1,214 identified for longitudinal follow-up. Of the longitudinal cohort, 510 were diagnosed with MDS, 302 with clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance (CCUS), 156 considered at-risk (participants with dysplasia, abnormal karyotype, or a genetic mutation), 114 ICUS, 103 MDS/MPN, and 29 AML with <30% blasts. The remaining 901 enrolled participants did not fit these groups and were not followed further.

Design

The design was a multi-center, prospective cohort study enrolling patients from centers in NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Participants were evaluated at baseline during which participant histories, baseline laboratory tests, quality of life assessments, environmental exposure determination, and diagnostic information including reports and treatment history were collected. Biospecimens obtained include peripheral blood and bone marrow, as well as eyebrow hair follicles and buccal cells. Slides were created from the collected bone marrow and peripheral blood to support histopathological review using a consistent, rigorous multi-stage review process that compared the diagnosis by the enrolling site and the MDS Study central pathologists, with adjudication by independent 3rd party. Based on both this histological assessment, and targeted genetic testing of DNA from the bone marrow, participants were classified into either the longitudinal cohort with follow-up every 6 months, or the cross-sectional cohort which marked the completion of their involvement in the study. For the longitudinal cohort, disease evaluation and medical examination, collection of peripheral blood samples and lab testing, quality of life assessments, and bone marrow sample collection (if the procedure was clinically required) occurred every 6 months. All biological samples collected from participants at each visit were submitted to the Central Lab and Biorepository at the Moffitt Cancer Center for processing and storage with the goal of maintaining these samples for future research. A subset of the longitudinal cohort has paired whole genome sequences from bone marrow and peripheral blood that were taken at study entry; these are available through dbGaP and NHLBI’s TOPMed program. Digital histopathological slide images are available through BioData Catalyst.

Conclusions

The study has assembled a comprehensive worldclass clinical database from over 2,100 participants with suspected or newly diagnosed MDS or MDS/MPN overlap disorders including extensive quality of life assessments, laboratory data, and exposure history. Clinical data are linked to histopathology slides, and high-quality biospecimens from hematopoietic and germline tissues. Participants were enrolled from diverse centers across the United States. These resources are now made available to the scientific community to support investigator-initiated research.

DeZern AE, Gillis N, Otterstatter M, et al. A novel approach to defining progression in MDS and precursor myeloid conditions in the MDS Natural History Study. Blood Adv. 2026;10(8):2743-2753. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018770

Publications

Gillis N, Colin-Leitzinger C, Tang YH, Otterstatter M, Sherman S, Zhang L, Moscinski LC, Walker ME, Painter JS, Abel GA, Al Baghdadi T, Deeg HJ, Foran JM, Gore SD, Harrington AM, Kroft SH, Liu JJ, Saber W, Virani S, Bejar R, Lindsley RC, Padron E, Walter MJ, Komrokji R, DeZern AE, Sekeres MA. Am J Hematol. 2026 Jun;101(6):1407-1420. Clinical, Genetic, and Pathologic Variability in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Precursor Conditions Across Race, Ethnicity, and Sex. Epub 2026 Mar 29.PMID: 41906220 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70279


DeZern AE, Gillis N, Otterstatter M, Abel G, Padron E, Deeg HJ, Al Baghdadi T, Liu J, Xie Z, Zhang L, Moscinski L, Kroft S, Harrington A, Foran J, Komrokji R, Starczynowski D, Gore S, Saber W, Bejar R, Lindsley RC, Sherman S, Lee C, DiFronzo N, Walter M, Sekeres MA. A novel approach to defining progression in MDS and precursor myeloid conditions in the MDS Natural History Study. Blood Adv. 2026 Apr 28;10(8):2743-2753. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018770.PMID: 41671442 https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018770


Sekeres MA, DeZern AE, Otterstatter M, Padron E, Al Baghdadi T, Foran JM, Komrokji RS, Abel GA, Saber W, Gore SD, Lee C, Bejar R, Liu JJ, Deeg HJ, Sherman S, Lindsley RC, Walter MJ, Gillis N.

Exposure to Agent Orange and association with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Adv. 2026 May 12;10(9):3054-3058. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025019262.PMID: 41734386 https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025019262


DeZern A, Goll J, Jensen T, Srivatsan S, Gillis N, Abel G, Padron, E, Deeg J, Al Baghdadi T, Liu JL, Komrokji R, Gore S., Saber W, Bejar R, Walter M, Lindsley RC, Sherman S, DiFronzo N, Sekeres M; Correlation between peripheral blood and bone marrow mutations among patients with MDS from the National MDS Study. Blood Neoplasia 2024; 1 (3): 100026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100026


Gorak E, Otterstatter M, Al Baghdadi T, Gillis N, Foran JM, Liu JJ, Bejar R, Gore SD, Kroft SH, Harrington AM, Saber W, Starczynowski DT, Rollison DE, Zhang L, Moscinski LC, Wilson SH, Thompson J, Borchert C, Sherman S, Hebert D, Walker ME, Padron E, DeZern A, Sekeres MA. Discordant Pathologic Diagnoses of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms and Their Implications for Registries and Therapies. Blood Adv 2023; bloodadvances.2023010061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010061


Abel GA, Hebert D, Lee C, Rollison DE, Gillis N, Komrokji RS, Foran JM, Liu JJ, Al Baghdadi T, Deeg HJ, Gore SD, Saber W, Wilson SH, Otterstatter M, Thompson J, Borchert C, Padron E, DeZern A, Cella D, Sekeres MA. Health-Related Quality of Life and Vulnerability among People with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A US National Study. Blood Adv. 2023 May 5:bloodadvances.2022009000. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009000. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37146263. https://ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/doi/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009000/495681/Health-Related-Quality-of-Life-and-Vulnerability


DeZern, A. E., Goll, J. B., Lindsley, R. C., Bejar, R., Wilson, S. H., Hebert, D., Deeg, J., Zhang, L., Gore, S., Al Baghdadi, T., Maciejewski, J., Liu, J., Padron, E., Komrojki, R., Saber, W., Abel, G., Kroft, S. H., Harrington, A., Grimes, T., Reed, H., … Walter, M. J. (2023). Utility of targeted gene sequencing to differentiate myeloid malignancies from other cytopenic conditions. Blood advances, 7(14), 3749–3759. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008578


Miller, C. A., Walker, J. R., Jensen, T. L., Hooper, W. F., Fulton, R. S., Painter, J. S., Sekeres, M. A., Ley, T. J., Spencer, D. H., Goll, J. B., & Walter, M. J. (2022). Failure to Detect Mutations in U2AF1 due to Changes in the GRCh38 Reference Sequence. The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 24(3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.10.013


Sekeres, M. A., Gore, S. D., Stablein, D. M., DiFronzo, N., Abel, G. A., DeZern, A. E., Troy, J. D., Rollison, D. E., Thomas, J. W., Waclawiw, M. A., Liu, J. J., Al Baghdadi, T., Walter, M. J., Bejar, R., Gorak, E. J., Starczynowski, D. T., Foran, J. M., Cerhan, J. R., Moscinski, L. C., Komrokji, R. S., … Epling-Burnette, P. K. (2019). The National MDS Natural History Study: design of integrated data and sample biorepository to promote research studies in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia & lymphoma, 60(13), 3161–3171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1616186


Padron, E., Ball, M. C., Teer, J. K., Painter, J. S., Yoder, S. J., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Moscinski, L. C., Rollison, D. E., Gore, S. D., Bejar, R., Walter, M. J., Sekeres, M. A., Komrokji, R. S., & Epling-Burnette, P. K. (2018). Germ line tissues for optimal detection of somatic variants in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood, 131(21), 2402–2405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-01-827881

Additional Details

Subjects:

2,115

Age:

 

Total Subjects

18-29

21

30-39

33

40-49

71

50-59

209

60-69

491

70-79

830

80+

460

Sex:

 

Total Subjects

Female

798

Male

1,317

Race:

 

Total Subjects

American Indian or Alaska Native

16

Asian

37

Black or African American

108

Not Reported

25

Unknown

27

White

1,902

Please note that biospecimen availability is subject to review by the NHLBI, BioLINCC, and the NHLBI Biorepository. Certain biospecimens may not be made available for your request. The BioLINCC Users Guide describes the components of the review process

Material Types:

Serum | Bone Marrow Plasma | Peripheral Blood Smear Slides | Whole Blood, RNA Extraction | Bone Marrow Cells, MNC Fraction, Cryopreserved | Bone Marrow Smear Slides | DNA from Eyebrow Skin | DNA from Oral Cavity | DNA from Bone Marrow | DNA from Whole Blood | Bone Marrow Cells, CD34+, Cryopreserved | RNA from Bone Marrow | PBMC, Cryopreserved | Bone Marrow Cell Pellets (not cryopreserved) | PBMC, T Cell Fraction, Cryopreserved

General Freeze/Thaw Status:

Serum: 99% unthawed, 1% 1 thaw
Bone Marrow Plasma: 100% unthawed
Peripheral Blood Smear Slides: 100% unthawed
Whole Blood, RNA Extraction: 100% unthawed
Bone Marrow Cells, MNC Fraction, Cryopreserved: 100% unthawed
Bone Marrow Smear Slides: 100% unthawed
DNA from Eyebrow Skin: 100% unthawed
DNA from Oral Cavity: 100% unthawed
DNA from Bone Marrow: 71% unthawed, 29% 1 thaw
DNA from Whole Blood: 98% unthawed, 2% 1 thaw
Bone Marrow Cells, CD34+, Cryopreserved: 100% unthawed
RNA from Bone Marrow: 64% unthawed, 36% 1 thaw
PBMC, Cryopreserved: 100% unthawed
Bone Marrow Cell Pellets (not cryopreserved): 100% unthawed
PBMC, T Cell Fraction, Cryopreserved: 100% unthawed

Visits (Vials):

08/04/2026

 

Serum

Bone Marrow Plasma

Peripheral Blood Smear Slides

Whole Blood, RNA Extraction

Baseline

10,604

26,147

6,983

2,070

Rescreening

28

83

4

6

6 month follow-up

4,468

462

26

840

12 month follow-up

3,219

401

38

601

18 month follow-up

2,460

198

11

457

24 month follow-up

1,944

165

31

367

30 month follow-up

1,359

76

6

272

36 month follow-up

1,114

42

.

211

42 month follow-up

823

37

.

160

48 month follow-up

646

15

3

129

54 month follow-up

470

6

1

95

60 month follow-up

339

.

.

68

66 month follow-up

223

20

.

43

72 month follow-up

127

.

.

23

78 month follow-up

50

.

.

10

84 month follow-up

38

.

.

8

90 month follow-up

31

14

5

7

96 month follow-up

23

.

.

5

108 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

138 month follow-up

10

.

.

2

Ad Hoc visit

643

1,464

116

117

 

 

Bone Marrow Cells, MNC Fraction, Cryopreserved

Bone Marrow Smear Slides

DNA from Eyebrow Skin

DNA from Oral Cavity

Baseline

6,952

21,303

4,157

5,825

Rescreening

15

17

10

16

6 month follow-up

87

313

18

27

12 month follow-up

100

267

518

789

18 month follow-up

57

148

10

24

24 month follow-up

39

117

343

475

30 month follow-up

16

40

4

9

36 month follow-up

22

36

.

.

42 month follow-up

4

19

.

.

48 month follow-up

2

7

.

.

54 month follow-up

2

13

.

.

60 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

66 month follow-up

2

4

.

.

72 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

78 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

84 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

90 month follow-up

11

11

.

.

96 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

108 month follow-up

.

1

.

.

138 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

Ad Hoc visit

324

1,041

8

14

 

 

DNA from Bone Marrow

DNA from Whole Blood

Bone Marrow Cells, CD34+, Cryopreserved

RNA from Bone Marrow

Baseline

9,301

12,948

585

60

Rescreening

22

30

.

.

6 month follow-up

153

5,969

1

9

12 month follow-up

140

4,493

3

13

18 month follow-up

74

3,447

4

13

24 month follow-up

58

2,831

.

4

30 month follow-up

24

2,249

1

.

36 month follow-up

17

1,787

1

12

42 month follow-up

10

1,405

.

.

48 month follow-up

5

1,163

.

.

54 month follow-up

6

844

.

.

60 month follow-up

.

601

.

.

66 month follow-up

4

418

.

.

72 month follow-up

.

228

.

.

78 month follow-up

.

100

.

.

84 month follow-up

.

79

.

.

90 month follow-up

5

68

.

2

96 month follow-up

.

49

.

.

108 month follow-up

.

.

.

.

138 month follow-up

.

20

.

.

Ad Hoc visit

472

759

16

27

 

 

PBMC, Cryopreserved

Bone Marrow Cell Pellets (not cryopreserved)

PBMC, T Cell Fraction, Cryopreserved

Total Vials

Baseline

6,062

5,991

106

119,094

Rescreening

14

6

.

251

6 month follow-up

2,545

59

6

14,983

12 month follow-up

1,901

84

4

12,571

18 month follow-up

1,482

34

.

8,419

24 month follow-up

1,127

49

.

7,550

30 month follow-up

864

13

.

4,933

36 month follow-up

657

16

.

3,915

42 month follow-up

493

10

.

2,961

48 month follow-up

445

1

.

2,416

54 month follow-up

311

1

.

1,749

60 month follow-up

217

.

.

1,225

66 month follow-up

156

5

.

875

72 month follow-up

93

.

.

471

78 month follow-up

36

.

.

196

84 month follow-up

41

.

.

166

90 month follow-up

38

7

.

199

96 month follow-up

25

.

.

102

108 month follow-up

.

.

.

1

138 month follow-up

7

.

.

39

Ad Hoc visit

364

254

.

5,619

Visits (Subjects):

08/04/2026

 

Serum

Total number of subjects

Average volume (mL) per subject

Baseline

2,064

1.15

Rescreening

6

1.18

6 month follow-up

819

1.19

12 month follow-up

599

1.16

18 month follow-up

449

1.18

24 month follow-up

361

1.17

30 month follow-up

266

1.13

36 month follow-up

210

1.16

42 month follow-up

156

1.14

48 month follow-up

126

1.16

54 month follow-up

94

1.16

60 month follow-up

67

1.18

66 month follow-up

43

1.20

72 month follow-up

23

1.21

78 month follow-up

10

1.19

84 month follow-up

8

1.20

90 month follow-up

7

1.16

96 month follow-up

5

1.19

138 month follow-up

2

1.25

Ad Hoc visit

91

1.56

 

 

Bone Marrow Plasma

Total number of subjects

Average volume (mL) per subject

Baseline

2,021

3.84

Rescreening

6

3.89

6 month follow-up

32

4.67

12 month follow-up

28

4.82

18 month follow-up

13

4.95

24 month follow-up

12

4.07

30 month follow-up

5

4.92

36 month follow-up

3

4.43

42 month follow-up

2

6.25

48 month follow-up

1

6.25

54 month follow-up

1

1.60

66 month follow-up

1

5.00

90 month follow-up

1

3.50

Ad Hoc visit

85

5.24

 

 

Peripheral Blood Smear Slides

Total number of subjects

Average slides per subject

Baseline

1,963

3.56

Rescreening

1

4.00

6 month follow-up

7

3.71

12 month follow-up

11

3.45

18 month follow-up

2

5.50

24 month follow-up

6

5.17

30 month follow-up

2

3.00

48 month follow-up

1

3.00

54 month follow-up

1

1.00

90 month follow-up

1

5.00

Ad Hoc visit

28

4.14

*Available slides consist of a mix stained with either Wright Stain, Unstained, IHC, Prussian Blue, and those not specified. Majority are either Wright Stain Stained or Unstained.

 

Whole Blood, RNA Extraction

Total number of subjects

Average volume (mL) per subject

Baseline

2,064

9.26

Rescreening

6

9.08

6 month follow-up

827

9.31

12 month follow-up

597

9.23

18 month follow-up

450

9.34

24 month follow-up

361

9.30

30 month follow-up

268

9.32

36 month follow-up

208

9.21

42 month follow-up

157

9.32

48 month follow-up

126

9.36

54 month follow-up

94

9.14

60 month follow-up

68

9.13

66 month follow-up

43

9.03

72 month follow-up

23

9.33

78 month follow-up

10

9.20

84 month follow-up

8

9.13

90 month follow-up

7

9.00

96 month follow-up

5

9.10

138 month follow-up

2

9.50

Ad Hoc visit

92

11.65

 

 

Bone Marrow Cells, MNC Fraction, Cryopreserved

Total number of subjects

Average cell count (mill cells) per subject

Baseline

2,006

16.34

Rescreening

6

7.75

6 month follow-up

32

8.74

12 month follow-up

28

17.33

18 month follow-up

13

24.19

24 month follow-up

12

14.56

30 month follow-up

5

9.41

36 month follow-up

3

31.98

42 month follow-up

2

8.33

48 month follow-up

1

1.68

54 month follow-up

1

17.40

66 month follow-up

1

1.74

90 month follow-up

1

62.80

Ad Hoc visit

84

17.33

 

 

Bone Marrow Smear Slides

Total number of subjects

Average slides per subject

Baseline

2,074

10.27

Rescreening

2

8.50

6 month follow-up

32

9.78

12 month follow-up

31

8.61

18 month follow-up

17

8.71

24 month follow-up

13

9.00

30 month follow-up

5

8.00

36 month follow-up

4

9.00

42 month follow-up

2

9.50

48 month follow-up

1

7.00

54 month follow-up

2

6.50

66 month follow-up

1

4.00

90 month follow-up

1

11.00

108 month follow-up

1

1.00

Ad Hoc visit

94

11.07

*Available slides consist of a mix stained with either H&E, IHC, Prussian Blue, Pap Stain, Wright Stain, Unstained, and those not specified. 

 

DNA from Eyebrow Skin

Total number of subjects

Average mass (ug) per subject

Baseline

2,044

0.33

Rescreening

5

0.36

6 month follow-up

9

0.38

12 month follow-up

257

0.30

18 month follow-up

5

0.29

24 month follow-up

169

0.31

30 month follow-up

2

0.18

Ad Hoc visit

4

0.27

 

 

DNA from Oral Cavity

Total number of subjects

Average mass (ug) per subject

Baseline

1,909

2.56

Rescreening

5

1.28

6 month follow-up

9

2.11

12 month follow-up

270

2.66

18 month follow-up

11

2.53

24 month follow-up

159

2.73

30 month follow-up

3

1.45

Ad Hoc visit

4

5.76

 

 

DNA from Bone Marrow

Total number of subjects

Average mass (ug) per subject

Baseline

2,010

13.81

Rescreening

6

8.87

6 month follow-up

32

7.96

12 month follow-up

27

9.73

18 month follow-up

13

11.20

24 month follow-up

12

3.97

30 month follow-up

5

6.51

36 month follow-up

3

10.33

42 month follow-up

2

11.09

48 month follow-up

1

2.49

54 month follow-up

1

4.34

66 month follow-up

1

7.96

90 month follow-up

1

12.00

Ad Hoc visit

84

8.30

 

 

DNA from Whole Blood

Total number of subjects

Average mass (ug) per subject

Baseline

2,066

123.68

Rescreening

6

85.44

6 month follow-up

833

118.75

12 month follow-up

605

117.89

18 month follow-up

453

122.06

24 month follow-up

365

125.64

30 month follow-up

270

124.60

36 month follow-up

212

128.57

42 month follow-up

159

129.60

48 month follow-up

129

131.58

54 month follow-up

97

118.06

60 month follow-up

69

121.47

66 month follow-up

44

127.46

72 month follow-up

23

135.33

78 month follow-up

10

166.88

84 month follow-up

8

178.98

90 month follow-up

7

203.95

96 month follow-up

5

178.83

138 month follow-up

2

196.54

Ad Hoc visit

93

121.96

 

 

Bone Marrow Cells, CD34+, Cryopreserved

Total number of subjects

Average cell count (mill cells) per subject

Baseline

320

3.96

6 month follow-up

1

0.19

12 month follow-up

2

4.47

18 month follow-up

2

8.88

30 month follow-up

1

0.14

36 month follow-up

1

4.86

Ad Hoc visit

9

10.22

 

 

RNA from Bone Marrow

Total number of subjects

Average mass (ug) per subject

Baseline

49

1.01

6 month follow-up

2

5.09

12 month follow-up

2

6.96

18 month follow-up

2

6.57

24 month follow-up

1

1.92

36 month follow-up

2

2.44

90 month follow-up

1

0.65

Ad Hoc visit

6

3.74

 

 

PBMC, Cryopreserved

Total number of subjects

Average cell count (mill cells) per subject

Baseline

2,071

15.15

Rescreening

6

10.76

6 month follow-up

828

16.99

12 month follow-up

599

15.67

18 month follow-up

450

17.05

24 month follow-up

361

20.19

30 month follow-up

267

18.33

36 month follow-up

210

16.86

42 month follow-up

157

16.93

48 month follow-up

126

17.66

54 month follow-up

93

30.28

60 month follow-up

66

32.35

66 month follow-up

43

19.07

72 month follow-up

23

23.07

78 month follow-up

10

29.43

84 month follow-up

8

25.78

90 month follow-up

7

31.12

96 month follow-up

5

27.35

138 month follow-up

2

19.20

Ad Hoc visit

91

36.28

 

 

Bone Marrow Cell Pellets (not cryopreserved)

Total number of subjects

Average cell count (mill cells) per subject

Baseline

2,008

12.76

Rescreening

6

2.75

6 month follow-up

32

5.04

12 month follow-up

27

11.61

18 month follow-up

13

14.37

24 month follow-up

12

21.68

30 month follow-up

5

7.17

36 month follow-up

3

14.26

42 month follow-up

2

20.82

48 month follow-up

1

0.24

54 month follow-up

1

0.95

66 month follow-up

1

17.30

90 month follow-up

1

79.15

Ad Hoc visit

83

12.98

 

 

PBMC, T Cell Fraction, Cryopreserved

Total number of subjects

Average cell count (mill cells) per subject

Baseline

53

2.08

6 month follow-up

3

0.58

12 month follow-up

2

1.42

Please note that researchers must be registered on this site to submit a request, and you will be prompted to log in. If you are not registered on this site, you can do so via the Request button. Registration is quick, easy and free.

Resources Available

Specimens and Study Datasets

Materials Available

  • Bone Marrow Cell Pellets
  • Bone Marrow Cells, CD34+, Cryopreserved
  • Bone Marrow Cells, MNC Fraction, Cryopreserved
  • Bone Marrow Plasma
  • Bone Marrow Smear Slides
  • DNA
  • PBMC, Cryopreserved
  • PBMC, T Cell Fraction, Cryopreserved
  • Peripheral Blood Smear Slides
  • RNA
  • Serum
  • Whole Blood, Paxgene (RNA)
  • More Details

Study Documents

Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in the study documents. For assistance, Contact BioLINCC and include the web address and/or publication title in your message. If you need help accessing information in different file formats such as PDF, XLS, DOC, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.