Discharge BNP is a stronger predictor of 6-month mortality in acute heart failure compared with baseline BNP and admission-to-discharge percentage BNP reduction.

Pubmed ID: 27467969

Journal: International journal of cardiology

Publication Date: Oct. 15, 2016

Affiliation: Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Linda and Jack Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, United States, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Proportional Hazards Models, Heart Failure, Prognosis, Patient Discharge, Retrospective Studies, Predictive Value of Tests, Acute Disease, Patient Readmission, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy

Authors: Guglin M, Omar HR

Cite As: Omar HR, Guglin M. Discharge BNP is a stronger predictor of 6-month mortality in acute heart failure compared with baseline BNP and admission-to-discharge percentage BNP reduction. Int J Cardiol 2016 Oct 15;221:1116-22. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Studies:

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies found a significant relationship between admission B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), discharge BNP and admission-to-discharge percentage BNP reduction and post-discharge mortality in acute heart failure (HF). METHODS: The ESCAPE trial data was utilized to identify which of these BNP parameters best predicts 6-month all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 433 patients (mean age 56years, 74% men) included in our analysis had an admission BNP, discharge BNP and admission-to-discharge percentage BNP reduction of 1009pg/mL, 743pg/mL and -70%, respectively. There were significant differences between survivors and nonsurvivors with regards to admission BNP (P=0.001), discharge BNP (P=0.0001) and admission-to-discharge percentage BNP reduction (P=0.01). Discharge BNP had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for predicting mortality (AUC=0.702, P<0.001) followed by admission BNP (AUC=0.633, P=0.0006) then percentage BNP reduction (AUC=0.620, P=0.008). Comparison of AUC revealed a significant difference between discharge BNP and admission BNP (difference between areas 0.087, P=0.0223) and a trend towards significance when comparing AUC of discharge BNP with percentage BNP reduction (P=0.0637). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in survival according to optimum cutoff values of discharge BNP of 319pg/mL (log-rank P<0.001), admission BNP of 912pg/mL (P<0.001) and percentage BNP reduction of 7.71% (P=0.008). Cox-proportional-hazard-analysis revealed that discharge BNP is an independent predictor of 6-month mortality (hazard ratio=1.063, 95% CI=1.037-1.089, P<0.001). The combination of a discharge BNP ≤319pg/mL and percentage BNP reduction ≥7.71% was associated with significantly lower mortality (4.8% versus 27.2%, relative risk=0.134, 95% CI=0.046-0.387, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The absolute BNP value at discharge is a more accurate predictor of 6-month mortality than the magnitude of percentage in-hospital BNP reduction and baseline BNP.