Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether using both objectively (accelerometer) and subjectively (questionnaire) measured moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time (SED) improves the prediction of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (pre/T2D) using data from the Framingham Heart Study (<i>n</i> = 4200). Logistic regression was used to examine the odds ratio of pre/T2D in groups cross-classified by subjective and objective MVPA and SED. Less than half of participants fell into concordant categories of MVPA and SED using subjective and objective measures, with 7.0%-9.4% of participants in the extreme discordant categories of high-low or low-high subjective-objective MVPA or SED. Low objective MVPA, regardless of subjective MVPA status, was associated with a higher prevalence of pre/T2D (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). When cross-classifying by MVPA and SED, the majority of participants fell into concordant categories of MVPA-SED, with &lt;4% of participants in the extreme discordant categories of MVPA-SED. Low objective MVPA, regardless of objective SED, was associated with a higher prevalence of pre/T2D (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). These findings suggest that low objectively measured MVPA appears more closely associated with pre/T2D risk compared with subjective measures, and there does not appear to be an additive effect of SED on pre/T2D risk after accounting for MVPA.