Comparing Strategies for Lipid Lowering in Argentina: An Analysis from the CVD Policy Model-Argentina.

Pubmed ID: 27853916

Pubmed Central ID: PMC5400755

Journal: Journal of general internal medicine

Publication Date: May 1, 2017

Affiliation: Hospital de Clinicas, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Risk Factors, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Primary Prevention, Argentina

Grants: K24 DK102057

Authors: Bibbins-Domingo K, Moran A, Coxson P, Heller D, Konfino J, Fernandez A, Penko J, Mason A, Martinez E, Pérez-Stable EJ, Mejía R

Cite As: Konfino J, Fernandez A, Penko J, Mason A, Martinez E, Coxson P, Heller D, Moran A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Pérez-Stable EJ, Mejía R. Comparing Strategies for Lipid Lowering in Argentina: An Analysis from the CVD Policy Model-Argentina. J Gen Intern Med 2017 May;32(5):524-533. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

Studies:

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In Argentina, the national guidelines for lipid control emphasize the use of relatively inexpensive low- or moderate-potency statins by patients at high risk (>20 %) of a cardiovascular event. The objective of this study was to compare the impact and costs of the current national CVD prevention guidelines with regard to morbidity and mortality in Argentina with the impact and costs of three strategies that incorporate high-potency statins. METHODS: We used the CVD Policy Model-Argentina to model the proposed interventions. This model is a national-scale, state-transition (Markov) computer simulation model of the CVD incidence, prevalence, mortality, and costs in adults 35-84 years of age. We modeled three scenarios: scenario 1 lowers the risk threshold for treatment to >10 % according the Framingham Risk Score (FRS); scenario 2 intensifies statin potency under current treatment thresholds; and scenario 3 combines both scenarios by lowering the treatment threshold to ≥10 % FRS and intensifying statin potency. RESULTS: Scenario 1 would translate into 1400 fewer MIs and 500 fewer CHD deaths every year, a 3 % and 2 % reduction, respectively. Scenario 2 would lead to 2000 fewer MIs and 1000 fewer CHD deaths every year. Scenario 3 would result in the greatest reduction in MIs and CHD deaths, with 3400 fewer MIs and 1400 fewer CHD deaths every year, which translates to a 7 % and 6 % reduction, respectively. All scenarios were cost-effective if the cost of a high-potency statin pill was under US$0.25. CONCLUSION: Incorporating those individuals with greater than 10 % cardiovascular risk and the use of high-potency statins into Argentina's national lipid guidelines could result in fewer CHD deaths and events at a reasonable cost.