A prospective study of sexual transmission of human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I and HTLV-II.
Pubmed ID: 15809908
Journal: The Journal of infectious diseases
Publication Date: May 1, 2005
MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Aged, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Middle Aged, Incidence, Cross-Sectional Studies, HTLV-I Infections, HTLV-II Infections, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Socioeconomic Factors
Grants: N01-HB-47114, N01-HB-97078, N01-HB-97079, N01-HB-97080, N01-HB-97081, N01-HB-97082, R01-HL-62235
Authors: Lee TH, Murphy EL, Nass CC, Roucoux DF, Wang B, Smith D, Smith J, Hutching ST, Newman B, Chafets DM
Cite As: Roucoux DF, Wang B, Smith D, Nass CC, Smith J, Hutching ST, Newman B, Lee TH, Chafets DM, Murphy EL, HTLV Outcomes Study Investigators. A prospective study of sexual transmission of human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I and HTLV-II. J Infect Dis 2005 May 1;191(9):1490-7. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
Studies:
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies support sexual transmission of human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I/II; however, prospective incidence data, particularly for HTLV-II, are limited. METHODS: A cohort of 85 HTLV-positive (30 with HTLV-I and 55 with HTLV-II) blood donors and their stable (>or=6 months) heterosexual sex partners were followed biannually over the course of a 10-year period. RESULTS: Four of 85 initially seronegative sex partners of HTLV-I and -II carriers seroconverted, for an incidence rate (IR) of 0.6 transmissions/100 person-years (py) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-1.6). This includes 2 HTLV-I transmissions/219 py (IR, 0.9 transmissions/100 py [95% CI, 0.1-3.3]) and 2 HTLV-II transmissions/411 py (IR, 0.5 transmissions/100 py [95% CI, 0.06-1.8]), with no significant difference by HTLV type. There were 2 male-to-female (IR, 1.2 transmissions/100 py [95% CI, 0.1-4.3]) and 2 female-to-male (IR, 0.4 transmissions/100 py [95% CI, 0.05-1.6) transmissions. HTLV-I or -II proviral load was 2 log10 lower in newly infected partners than in index positive partners who transmitted HTLV (P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of sexual transmission of HTLV-II may be similar to that of HTLV-I, and female-to-male transmission may play a more important role than previously thought. HTLV-I and -II proviral load may be lower in sexually acquired infection, because of a small infectious dose.