Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE)
Note that you will be prompted to log in or register an account
Accession Number
HLB02382121a
Study Type
Clinical Trial
Collection Type
Open BioLINCC Study
See bottom of this webpage for request information
Study Period
January 2009 – December 2013
NHLBI Division
DLD
Dataset(s) Last Updated
August 5, 2024
Clinical Trial URLs
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00814099
Primary Publication URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25602358/
Consent
Commercial Use Data Restrictions No
Data Restrictions Based On Area Of Research No
Objectives
The primary aim of the RESTORE clinical trial was to determine whether critically ill children managed with a nurse-implemented, goal-directed sedation protocol would experience fewer days of mechanical ventilation than patients receiving usual care.
Background
Ensuring the safety and comfort of critically ill infants and children supported by mechanical ventilation is integral to the practice of pediatric critical care. Although sedation therapy benefits young patients who cannot understand the imperative nature of invasive life-sustaining therapies, sedative use is also associated with untoward adverse effects. Specifically, opioids and benzodiazepines commonly used for pediatric sedation may impair bedside neurological assessment, depress spontaneous ventilation, and prolong mechanical ventilation. Over time, drug tolerance develops, which may precipitate iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome when sedation therapy is no longer necessary.
Numerous studies in adult critical care support a minimal yet effective approach to sedation management. Sedation goals for mechanically ventilated adults have shifted from an unresponsive state to a calm, easily aroused, readily evaluated patient. Studies in adult patients evaluating targeted sedation, daily interruption and/or titration of sedation, pairing of spontaneous awakening with breathing, and no sedation have reported improved clinical outcomes, including decreased length of mechanical ventilation when compared with usual care.
In contrast, few data inform sedation practices in pediatric critical care, and international studies describe significant practice variation. Given unique biobehavioral differences, knowledge generated in adult critical care may not translate to the care of critically ill children. The RESTORE study was conducted to test the effect of a nurse-implemented, goal-directed sedation protocol on clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure.
Participants
A total of 2,449 children (mean age, 4.7 years; range, 2 weeks to 17 years) mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure were enrolled in 2009-2013 and followed up until 72 hours after opioids were discontinued, 28 days, or hospital discharge.
Design
The RESTORE study was a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in 31 US PICUs. Intervention PICUs (17 sites; 1,225 patients) used a protocol that included targeted sedation, arousal assessments, extubation readiness testing, sedation adjustment every 8 hours, and sedation weaning. Control PICUs (14 sites; 1,224 patients) managed sedation per usual care. The primary outcome variable was duration of mechanical ventilation.
Conclusions
Among children undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, the use of a sedation protocol compared with usual care did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes suggest a complex relationship among wakefulness, pain, and agitation (JAMA 2015; 313(4):379-89).
Please note that researchers must be registered on this site to submit a request, and you will be prompted to log in. If you are not registered on this site, you can do so via the Request button. Registration is quick, easy and free.
Resources Available
Study Datasets OnlyStudy Documents
- Data Dictionary (PDF - 925.4 KB)
- RESTORE Annotated Case Report Forms (PDF - 32.8 MB)
- RESTORE Protocol (PDF - 1.0 MB)
- RESTORE Publications (PDF - 119.3 KB)
Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in the study documents. For assistance, Contact BioLINCC and include the web address and/or publication title in your message. If you need help accessing information in different file formats such as PDF, XLS, DOC, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.