Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults: An INTERMACS Analysis.

Pubmed ID: 31779930

Journal: JACC. Heart failure

Publication Date: Dec. 1, 2019

Affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. Electronic address: vt2113@cumc.columbia.edu.

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213177919307887

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, United States, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Heart Failure, Treatment Outcome, Registries, Heart-Assist Devices, Postoperative Complications, Prosthesis Implantation

Authors: Ahmad T, Maurer MS, Topkara VK, Miller PE, Caraballo C, Ravindra NG, Mezzacappa C, McCullough M, Gruen J, Levin A, Reinhardt S, Ali A, Desai NR, DeFilippis EM, Nakagawa S, Mullan C

Cite As: Caraballo C, DeFilippis EM, Nakagawa S, Ravindra NG, Miller PE, Mezzacappa C, McCullough M, Gruen J, Levin A, Reinhardt S, Mullan C, Ali A, Maurer MS, Desai NR, Ahmad T, Topkara VK. Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults: An INTERMACS Analysis. JACC Heart Fail 2019 Dec;7(12):1069-1078.

Studies:

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in older adults (>75 years of age). BACKGROUND: An aging heart failure population together with improvements in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology have led to increasing LVAD implantations in older adults. However, data presenting age-specific outcomes are limited. METHODS: Adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) who required durable MCS between 2008 and 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by 4 age groups: <55 years of age, 55 to 64 years of age, and >75 years of age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess post-LVAD outcomes, with log-rank testing used to compare groups. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine predictors of survival and complications. RESULTS: A total of 20,939 individuals received an LVAD during the study period: 7,743 (37.0%) were <55 years of age, 6,755 (32.3%) were 55 to 64 years of age, 5,418 (25.9%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 1,023 (4.9%) were ≥75 years of age or older. After multivariate adjustment, adults ≥75 years of age had increased mortality post-LVAD implantation. Elderly patients with LVADs had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding but lower rates of device thrombosis. Compared to 84.5% of patients <55 years of age who were discharged home, only 46.8% of adults ≥75 years of age were discharged home following implantation (p < 0.001). Use of a RVAD, serum albumin level, and 6-min walk test distances were identified as predictors of outcomes in the oldest cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful selection of older adults for LVAD implantation, age remains a significant predictor of mortality. Higher bleeding and lower clotting risk in elderly patients with LVADs support the use of a less intense antithrombotic regimen in this unique population.