Predicting Heart Failure From 12-Lead ECGs Using AI: A HeartShare/AMP-HF Pooled Cohort Analysis.

Pubmed ID: 41493294

Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Publication Date: March 3, 2026

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Cohort Studies, Artificial Intelligence, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Heart Failure, Predictive Value of Tests, Electrocardiography

Authors: Butler J, Lopez-Jimenez F, Pandey A, Ahmad FS, Desai AS, Shah SH, Shah SJ, Suratekar R, Alger HM, Anto AG, Nujum G S, Oh JK, Asfahan S, Narasimha S, Reddy N S, Kaligounder L, Ciga M, Awasthi S

Cite As: Desai AS, Pandey A, Suratekar R, Ahmad FS, Alger HM, Anto AG, Nujum G S, Lopez-Jimenez F, Oh JK, Asfahan S, Narasimha S, Reddy N S, Kaligounder L, Ciga M, Awasthi S, Butler J, Shah SH, Shah SJ. Predicting Heart Failure From 12-Lead ECGs Using AI: A HeartShare/AMP-HF Pooled Cohort Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2026 Mar 3;87(8):990-1005. Epub 2025 Nov 8.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) offers a scalable approach to identify individuals at risk for heart failure (HF) and guide preventive interventions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether ECG-AI designed to detect systolic and diastolic dysfunction enhances the prediction of incident HF over clinical risk estimation using the PREVENT-HF (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs-Heart Failure) equation. METHODS: Baseline clinical and electrocardiogram data were pooled from the Framingham Heart Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Health Study. Participants with data sufficient for both ECG-AI and PREVENT-HF assessment were included. Analyses were performed on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute BioDataCatalyst from July to September 2025. Risk of incident HF was estimated using previously validated ECG-AI algorithms that detect systolic (ECG-AI LEF) and diastolic (ECG-AI DD) dysfunction. Discrimination and reclassification were evaluated using Harrell's C-statistic and net reclassification improvement. RESULTS: Of 14,126 participants, positive screening rates were 2.9% for ECG-AI LEF, 11.1% for ECG-AI DD, 11.9% for the composite ECG-AI model, 25.1% for PREVENT-HF score ≥10%, and 5.8% for PREVENT-HF score ≥20%. Incident HF or death occurred in 7.7% and 15.1% of participants, respectively. Participants with positive composite ECG-AI screens at baseline had 10- to 20-fold higher risk of developing HF compared with those with negative screens. At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, the addition of ECG-AI to PREVENT-HF yielded 1-directional net reclassification improvements ranging from 0.086 to 0.125 at a PREVENT-HF threshold of 10%, and 0.327 to 0.403 at a threshold of 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ECG-AI to PREVENT-HF improved discrimination of near-term HF risk. ECG-AI may enable population-level HF risk stratification and facilitate targeted prevention strategies.