Carotid ultrasonography improves residual risk stratification in guidelines-defined high cardiovascular risk patients.

Pubmed ID: 35580589

Journal: European journal of preventive cardiology

Publication Date: Oct. 18, 2022

MeSH Terms: Humans, Cardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Carotid Artery Diseases, Atherosclerosis, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Ultrasonography, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Heart Disease Risk Factors

Authors: Georgiopoulos G, Mavraganis G, Delialis D, Georgiou S, Aivalioti E, Patras R, Petropoulos I, Dimopoulou MA, Angelidakis L, Sianis A, Bampatsias D, Dimoula A, Maneta E, Kosmopoulos M, Vardavas C, Stellos K, Stamatelopoulos K

Cite As: Georgiopoulos G, Mavraganis G, Delialis D, Georgiou S, Aivalioti E, Patras R, Petropoulos I, Dimopoulou MA, Angelidakis L, Sianis A, Bampatsias D, Dimoula A, Maneta E, Kosmopoulos M, Vardavas C, Stellos K, Stamatelopoulos K. Carotid ultrasonography improves residual risk stratification in guidelines-defined high cardiovascular risk patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022 Oct 18;29(13):1773-1784.

Studies:

Abstract

AIMS: The clinical value of carotid atherosclerosis markers for residual risk stratification in high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk patients is not established. We aimed to derive and validate optimal values of markers of carotid subclinical atherosclerosis improving risk stratification in guidelines-defined high ASCVD risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We consecutively analysed high or very high ASCVD risk patients from a cardiovascular (CV) prevention registry (n = 751, derivation cohort) and from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (n = 2,897, validation cohort). Baseline ASCVD risk was defined using the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines (clinical ESCrisk). Intima-media thickness excluding plaque, average maximal (avg.maxWT), maximal wall thickness (maxWT) and number of sites with carotid plaque were assessed. As primary endpoint of the study was defined the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and revascularization after a median of 3.4 years in both cohorts and additionally for 16.7 years in the ARIC cohort. RESULTS: MaxWT > 2.00 mm and avg.maxWT > 1.39 mm provided incremental prognostic value, improved discrimination and correctly reclassified risk over the clinical ESCrisk both in the derivation and the validation cohort (P < 0.05 for net reclassification index, integrated discrimination index and Delta Harrell's C index). MaxWT < 0.9 mm predicted very low probability of CV events (negative predictive value = 97% and 92% in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively). These findings were additionally confirmed for very long-term events in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Integration of carotid ultrasonography in guidelines-defined risk stratification may identify patients at very high-risk in need for further residual risk reduction or at very low probability for events.