The progression of cardiometabolic disease: validation of a new cardiometabolic disease staging system applicable to obesity.
Pubmed ID: 23894121
Pubmed Central ID: PMC3866217
Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)
Publication Date: Jan. 1, 2014
MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Cardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Adolescent, Longitudinal Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Young Adult, Incidence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Blood Glucose, Nutrition Surveys, Glucose Intolerance, Metabolic Syndrome
Grants: DK-038765, DK-083562, P30 DK079626, P60 DK079626, P60-DK079626, R01 DK038765, R01 DK083562, I01 CX000432
Authors: Guo F, Moellering DR, Garvey WT
Cite As: Guo F, Moellering DR, Garvey WT. The progression of cardiometabolic disease: validation of a new cardiometabolic disease staging system applicable to obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014 Jan;22(1):110-8. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Studies:
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate a Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (CMDS) system for assigning risk level for diabetes, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. DESIGN AND METHODS: Two large national cohorts, CARDIA and NHANES III, were used to validate CMDS. CMDS: Stage 0: metabolically healthy; Stage 1: one or two metabolic syndrome risk factors [other than impaired fasting glucose (IFG)]; Stage 2: IFG or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or metabolic syndrome (without IFG); Stage 3: two of three (IFG, IGT, and/or metabolic syndrome); and Stage 4: type 2 diabetes mellitus/CVD. RESULTS: In the CARDIA study, compared with Stage 0 metabolically healthy subjects, adjusted risk for diabetes exponentially increased from Stage 1 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-4.55], to Stage 2 (HR 8.06, 95% CI 4.91-13.2), to Stage 3 (HR 23.5, 95% CI 13.7-40.1) (P for trend <0.001). In NHANES III, both cumulative incidence and multivariable adjusted HRs markedly increased for both all-cause and CVD mortality with advancement of the risk stage from Stages 0 to 4. Adjustment for body mass index (BMI) minimally affected the risks for diabetes and all-cause/CVD mortality using CMDS. CONCLUSION: CMDS can discriminate a wide range of risk for diabetes, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality independent of BMI, and should be studied as a risk assessment tool to guide interventions that prevent and treat cardiometabolic disease.