Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.

Pubmed ID: 31169350

Pubmed Central ID: PMC8030629

Journal: Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)

Publication Date: July 1, 2019

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jch.13581

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Risk Factors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Hypertension, Coronary Disease, Risk Assessment, Blood Pressure, Ankle Brachial Index, Antihypertensive Agents, Patient Care Planning, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Poland

Authors: Sobieraj P, Lewandowski J, Siński M, Gaciong Z

Cite As: Sobieraj P, Lewandowski J, Siński M, Gaciong Z. Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019 Jul;21(7):911-918. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Studies:

Abstract

Automated office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) is recommended for diagnosing hypertension; however, optimal treatment targets using this method are not established. Discrepancies between automated and office measurements of blood pressure have been described, producing uncertainty regarding the use of AOBPM in clinical practice. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) results improved our understanding of target AOBPM systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels; however, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) targets remain unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the optimal on-treatment DBP range. The analysis was performed on the participants of the SPRINT trial who had hypertension and prior cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the data of 1470 participants (mean age 70.3 ± 9.3 years, 24.1% female) selected from the SPRINT trial database of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. The mean achieved SBP and DBP were 127.9 ± 10.7 and 68.3 ± 9.4 mm Hg, respectively. Most of the participants (57.4%) had a DBP lower than 70 mm Hg, while only 11.7% had DPB ≥80 mm Hg. Clinical composite endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes. There were 159 (10.8%) clinical endpoint events. The participants with on-treatment AOBPM DBP range of 68.6-78.6 mm Hg showed the lowest hazard risk of a clinical composite endpoint. These results correspond to the office DBP range of 70-80 mm Hg recommended in ESC guidelines. This is the first attempt to determine the range of optimal DBP values using population-based AOBPM in patients with prior cardiovascular disease.