Blood pressure visit-to-visit variability and outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Pubmed ID: 34405581

Pubmed Central ID: PMC8497211

Journal: ESC heart failure

Publication Date: Oct. 1, 2021

Affiliation: Chest Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Heart Failure, Blood Pressure, Stroke Volume, Blood Pressure Determination, Infant, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Authors: Zhou B, Li X, Zhang Q, Hu Y, Ma Y, Cong H

Cite As: Zhang Q, Zhou B, Ma Y, Hu Y, Li X, Cong H. Blood pressure visit-to-visit variability and outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail 2021 Oct;8(5):3984-3996. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Studies:

Abstract

AIMS: Previous studies report that blood pressure (BP) variability is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. However, studies have not fully explored this association in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to explore the association between visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of BP and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1988 patients (mean age of 67.73 ± 9.22, 51.7% female) from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial were included in this study. BP-VVV was determined by standard deviation (SD) of mean systolic BP (SBP-SD) from six measurements (baseline and months 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12) during the first 12 months after randomization. Mean on-treatment SBP during the first 12 months was 127.77 ± 10.42 mmHg, and the median of SBP-SD was 8.15 mmHg. A total of 192 (9.7%) patients met the primary outcome during the subsequent median follow-up of 35.16 months, including a composite of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest. Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that SBP-SD was independently associated with the increased risk of the primary outcome after adjusting for age, gender, method of BP measurement, treatment, renal function and common co-morbidities, and the mean SBP during the first 12 months [hazard ratio (HR) for fourth vs. first quartile, 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.49; P = 0.024]. Analysis showed that SBP-SD as continuous variable was associated with a 23% increase in the risk of primary outcome (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study show that high SBP-VVV in patients with HFpEF is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes independent of the mean on-treatment SBP.