Donor levels of serum alanine aminotransferase activity and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen associated with recipient hepatitis C and non-B, non-C outcomes.

Pubmed ID: 8823449

Journal: Transfusion

Publication Date: Sept. 1, 1996

Affiliation: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Multivariate Analysis, Blood Donors, Hepatitis C, Alanine Transaminase, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B Core Antigens, Transfusion Reaction

Grants: N01-HB-4-2972

Authors: Mosley JW, Nemo GJ, Aach RD, Hollinger FB, Stevens CE, Barbosa LH, Huang W, Stram DO, Nowicki MJ

Cite As: Mosley JW, Huang W, Stram DO, Nowicki MJ, Hollinger FB, Aach RD, Stevens CE, Barbosa LH, Nemo GJ. Donor levels of serum alanine aminotransferase activity and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen associated with recipient hepatitis C and non-B, non-C outcomes. Transfusion 1996 Sep;36(9):776-81.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis virus(es) that are neither hepatitis B (HBV) nor hepatitis C (HCV) (non-B, non-C [NBNC]) may be transmitted by transfusion. The present study assessed donor values for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) for their association with HCV and NBNC hepatitis outcomes among allogeneic blood recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on blood donors and recipients enrolled in the Transfusion- Transmitted Viruses Study in four United States cities from 1974 through 1980 were supplemented by anti-HBc testing of donors and anti-HCV evaluation of recipients. Two statistical approaches estimated the value of these indirect tests in detecting donors associated with HCV seroconversion and NBNC hepatitis in recipients. RESULTS: For HCV cases, donor ALT alone (at > or = 60 IU/L) had a sensitivity and a specificity of 30 and 96 percent, respectively, and anti-HBc alone (at > or = 60% inhibition) had a sensitivity and specificity of 53 and 86 percent, respectively. The two markers combined had a sensitivity and a specificity of 69 and 83 percent. For NBNC hepatitis cases, each measure had low sensitivity (20%) that was not improved by using both (28%) [corrected]. CONCLUSION: The indirect tests proved to be equal in sensitivity to the first-generation anti-HCV tests. The positive predictive power of these indirect tests in the 1980s was sufficient to affect HCV incidence in studies during that period. Improved anti-HCV assays, however, replaced the need for indirect tests. The sensitivity of indirect tests for NBNC hepatitis contributed little.