Trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction among individuals eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Pubmed ID: 33438234

Journal: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE

Publication Date: May 1, 2021

Affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Risk Factors, Middle Aged, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Databases, Factual, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable, Cardiomyopathies

Authors: Adabag S, Carlson S, Gravely A

Cite As: Carlson S, Gravely A, Adabag S. Trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction among individuals eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2021 May;44(5):800-806. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Studies:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine the trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) among patients eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. BACKGROUND: EF is the cornerstone criterion for ICD therapy, but the risk of sudden cardiac death remains after an improvement in EF. METHODS: We examined the trajectory of EF among 1178 participants of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) who had three or more assessments of EF, at least 90 days apart. A follow-up EF > 35% or >10% absolute increase in EF from baseline were examined as the criteria for EF improvement. RESULTS: At first follow-up, 381 (32%) patients had an improvement of EF to >35%. However, EF had returned back to ≤35% in 109 (27%) of these patients at second follow-up. Similarly, 446 (38%) patients experienced a >10% improvement in EF at first follow-up, but 109 (24%) of these had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF at the second follow-up. Of the 32 patients with normalized EF (≥55%) at first follow-up, 18 (56%) had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF. The fluctuation in EF was present in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy but a higher proportion of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy had an improvement in EF to >35% at first follow-up compared to those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (38% vs. 27%, p = < .0001). CONCLUSION: There is substantial fluctuation of EF among patients who are eligible for ICD therapy.