Influence of left ventricular remodeling on atrial fibrillation recurrence and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients undergoing rhythm-control therapy.

Pubmed ID: 24794553

Journal: International journal of cardiology

Publication Date: June 15, 2014

Affiliation: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States. Electronic address: j.vilesgonzalez@med.miami.edu.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factors, Atrial Fibrillation, Hospitalization, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Recurrence, Ventricular Remodeling

Authors: Viles-Gonzalez JF, Rathod A, Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Mitrani RD, Fuster V, Panaich SS, Shah N, Grover PM, Chothani A, Mehta K, Hoosien M, Singh V, Savani GT, Deshmukh A, Patel N, Arora S, Schwartz C, Blisker M, Coffey JO

Cite As: Shah N, Badheka AO, Grover PM, Patel NJ, Chothani A, Mehta K, Hoosien M, Singh V, Savani GT, Deshmukh A, Rathod A, Patel N, Panaich SS, Arora S, Schwartz C, Blisker M, Coffey JO, Mitrani RD, Fuster V, Viles-Gonzalez JF. Influence of left ventricular remodeling on atrial fibrillation recurrence and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients undergoing rhythm-control therapy. Int J Cardiol 2014 Jun 15;174(2):288-92. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction may derive benefit from being in sinus rhythm but no data are available to support this strategy in them. We sought to investigate effect of left ventricular remodeling on cardiovascular outcomes in AF patients undergoing rhythm control strategy. METHODS: We identified 1088 patients with echocardiographic data on left ventricular mass (LVM) enrolled in the AFFIRM trial. Using the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) criteria, patients were divided into 4 categories: 1) normal geometry, 2) concentric remodeling, 3) eccentric hypertrophy, and 4) concentric hypertrophy. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence and the secondary endpoint was cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH). RESULTS: In rhythm control arm, median time to recurrence in patients with concentric LVH was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.2-24.5) vs. 28.3 months (95% CI 20.2-48.6) in patients without LVH. Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was independently predictive of AF recurrence (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.01, p=0.01) in rhythm control arm, but not in overall population or rate control arm. Both concentric and eccentric LVH were independently predictive of cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH) in the overall population, with respective HRs of 1.36 (1.04-1.78, p=0.03) and 1.38 (1.02-1.85, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Concentric LVH is predictive of AF recurrences when a predominantly pharmacologic rhythm-control strategy is employed. Different patterns of LVH seem to be important determinants of outcomes (AF recurrence and CVH). These findings may have important clinical implications for the management of patients with AF and LVH. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.