Identifying a low-flow phenotype in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a secondary analysis of the RELAX trial.
Pubmed ID: 30993916
Pubmed Central ID: PMC6676300
Journal: ESC heart failure
Publication Date: Aug. 1, 2019
Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ehf2.12431
MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Heart Failure, Stroke Volume, Peptide Fragments, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Phenotype, Exercise Tolerance
Grants: 5T32HL125247-03
Authors: Fonarow GC, Berry JD, Grodin JL, Pandey A, Patel KV, Mauricio R, Ayers C
Cite As: Patel KV, Mauricio R, Grodin JL, Ayers C, Fonarow GC, Berry JD, Pandey A. Identifying a low-flow phenotype in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a secondary analysis of the RELAX trial. ESC Heart Fail 2019 Aug;6(4):613-620. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Studies:
Abstract
AIMS: The relationship between resting stroke volume (SV) and prognostic markers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well established. We evaluated the association of SV index (SVI) at rest with exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in stable patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants enrolled in the Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) trial with available data on SVI by the Doppler method were included in this analysis (n = 185). A low-flow state defined by resting SVI < 35 mL/m<sup>2</sup> was present in 37% of study participants. Multivariable adjusted linear regression analysis suggested that higher resting heart rate, higher body weight, prevalent atrial fibrillation, and smaller left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension were each independently associated with lower SVI. Patients with low-flow HFpEF had lower systolic blood pressure and smaller LV end-diastolic dimension. In multivariable adjusted linear regression models, lower SVI was significantly associated with lower peak oxygen consumption (peak VO<sub>2</sub> ) and higher NT-proBNP levels at baseline, and greater decline in peak VO<sub>2</sub> at 6 month follow-up independent of other confounders. Resting LV ejection fraction was not associated with peak VO<sub>2</sub> and NT-proBNP levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity in the resting SVI distribution among patients with stable HFpEF, with more than one-third of patients identified with the low-flow HFpEF phenotype (SVI < 35 mL/m<sup>2</sup> ). Lower SVI was independently associated with lower peak VO<sub>2</sub> , higher NT-proBNP levels, and greater decline in peak VO<sub>2</sub> . These findings highlight the potential prognostic utility of SVI assessment in the management of patients with HFpEF.