Sarcopenic-obesity and cardiovascular disease risk in the elderly.

Pubmed ID: 19390754

Journal: The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Publication Date: May 1, 2009

Affiliation: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Comorbidity, Obesity, Waist Circumference, Age Distribution, Body Composition, Muscular Atrophy, Adipose Tissue, Electric Impedance, Geriatric Assessment, Hand Strength, Muscle Weakness, Muscle, Skeletal

Authors: Janssen I, Stephen WC

Cite As: Stephen WC, Janssen I. Sarcopenic-obesity and cardiovascular disease risk in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 2009 May;13(5):460-6.

Studies:

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine: 1) whether sarcopenic-obesity is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than either sarcopenia or obesity alone in the elderly, and 2) whether muscle mass or muscular strength is a stronger marker of CVD risk. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 3366 community-dwelling older (>or= 65 years) men and women who were free of CVD at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Waist circumference (WC), bioimpedance analysis, and grip strength were used to measure abdominal obesity, whole-body muscle mass, and muscular strength, respectively. Subjects were classified as normal, sarcopenic, obese, or sarcopenic-obese based on measures of WC and either muscle mass or strength. Participants were followed for 8 years for CVD development and proportional hazard regression models were used to compare risk estimates for CVD in the four groups after adjusting for age, sex, race, income, smoking, alcohol, and cognitive status. RESULTS: Compared with the normal group, CVD risk was not significantly elevated within the obese, sarcopenic, or sarcopenic-obese groups as determined by WC and muscle mass. When determined by WC and muscle strength, CVD risk was not significantly increased in the sarcopenic or obese groups, but was increased by 23% (95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.54, P=0.06) within the sarcopenic-obese group. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia and obesity alone were not sufficient to increase CVD risk. Sarcopenic-obesity, based on muscle strength but not muscle mass, was modestly associated with increased CVD risk. These findings imply that strength may be more important than muscle mass for CVD protection in old age.