HDL-subpopulation patterns in response to reductions in dietary total and saturated fat intakes in healthy subjects.

Pubmed ID: 10584043

Journal: The American journal of clinical nutrition

Publication Date: Dec. 1, 1999

Affiliation: Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA. berglun@cudept.cis.columbia.edu

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, United States, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Double-Blind Method, Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Dietary Fats, Cross-Over Studies, Black People, White People

Grants: 5-U01-HL-49644, 5-U01-HL-49648, 5-U01-HL-49649

Authors: Ginsberg HN, Ramakrishnan R, Berglund L, Lefevre M, Roheim PS, Oliver EH, Fontanez N, Holleran S, Matthews K

Cite As: Berglund L, Oliver EH, Fontanez N, Holleran S, Matthews K, Roheim PS, Ginsberg HN, Ramakrishnan R, Lefevre M. HDL-subpopulation patterns in response to reductions in dietary total and saturated fat intakes in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1999 Dec;70(6):992-1000.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information is available about HDL subpopulations during dietary changes. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the effect of reductions in total and saturated fat intakes on HDL subpopulations. DESIGN: Multiracial, young and elderly men and women (n = 103) participating in the double-blind, randomized DELTA (Dietary Effects on Lipoproteins and Thrombogenic Activities) Study consumed 3 different diets, each for 8 wk: an average American diet (AAD: 34.3% total fat,15.0% saturated fat), the American Heart Association Step I diet (28.6% total fat, 9.0% saturated fat), and a diet low in saturated fat (25.3% total fat, 6.1% saturated fat). RESULTS: HDL(2)-cholesterol concentrations, by differential precipitation, decreased (P < 0.001) in a stepwise fashion after the reduction of total and saturated fat: 0.58 +/- 0.21, 0.53 +/- 0.19, and 0.48 +/- 0.18 mmol/L with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively. HDL(3) cholesterol decreased (P < 0.01) less: 0.76 +/- 0.13, 0.73 +/- 0.12, and 0.72 +/- 0.11 mmol/L with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively. As measured by nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, the larger-size HDL(2b) subpopulation decreased with the reduction in dietary fat, and a corresponding relative increase was seen for the smaller-sized HDL(3a, 3b), and (3c) subpopulations (P < 0.01). HDL(2)-cholesterol concentrations correlated negatively with serum triacylglycerol concentrations on all 3 diets: r = -0.46, -0.37, and -0.45 with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively (P < 0.0001). A similar negative correlation was seen for HDL(2b), whereas HDL(3a, 3b), and (3c) correlated positively with triacylglycerol concentrations. Diet-induced changes in serum triacylglycerol were negatively correlated with changes in HDL(2) and HDL(2b) cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in dietary total and saturated fat decreased both large (HDL(2) and HDL(2b)) and small, dense HDL subpopulations, although decreases in HDL(2) and HDL(2b) were most pronounced.