Natural history of concentric left ventricular geometry in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure during seven years of follow-up.
Pubmed ID: 21129719
Pubmed Central ID: PMC3022324
Journal: The American journal of cardiology
Publication Date: Jan. 15, 2011
MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Heart Failure, Disease Progression, Prospective Studies, Prognosis, Follow-Up Studies, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Echocardiography, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Heart Ventricles, Ventricular Remodeling
Grants: R01 HL085561, R01-HL085561, R01 HL085561-03, R01 HL097047, R01 HL097047-01, R01-HL097047
Authors: Ahmed MI, Ahmed A, Mujib M, Desai RV, Aban IB, Zile MR
Cite As: Desai RV, Ahmed MI, Mujib M, Aban IB, Zile MR, Ahmed A. Natural history of concentric left ventricular geometry in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure during seven years of follow-up. Am J Cardiol 2011 Jan 15;107(2):321-4. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
Studies:
- Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)
- Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
- Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Primary Outcome Paper (SPRINT-POP) Data
Abstract
Presence of concentric left ventricular (LV) geometry has important pathophysiologic and prognostic implications. However, little is known about its natural history in older adults. Of the 5,795 community-dwelling adults ≥65 years of age in the Cardiovascular Health Study, 1,871 without baseline heart failure had data on baseline and 7-year echocardiograms. Of these 343 (18%) had baseline concentric LV geometry (concentric remodeling 83%, concentric LV hypertrophy [LVH] 17%) and are the focus of the present study. LV geometry at year 7 was categorized into 4 groups based on LVH (LV mass indexed for height >51 g/m²·⁷) and relative wall thickness (RWT): eccentric hypertrophy (RWT ≤0.42 with LVH), concentric hypertrophy (RWT >0.42 with LVH), concentric remodeling (RWT >0.42 without LVH), and normal (RWT ≤0.42 without LVH). At year 7, LV geometry normalized in 57%, remained unchanged in 35%, and transitioned to eccentric hypertrophy in 7% of participants. Incident eccentric hypertrophy occurred in 4% and 25% of those with baseline concentric remodeling and concentric hypertrophy, respectively, and was associated with increased LV end-diastolic volume and decreased LV ejection fraction at year 7. Previous myocardial infarction and baseline above-median LV mass (>39 g/m²·⁷) and RWT (>0.46) had significant unadjusted associations with incident eccentric LVH; however, only LV mass >39 g/m²·⁷ (odds ratio 17.52, 95% confidence interval 3.91 to 78.47, p <0.001) and previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio 4.73, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 19.32, p = 0.031) had significant independent associations. In conclusion, in community-dwelling older adults with concentric LV geometry, transition to eccentric hypertrophy was uncommon but structurally maladaptive.