Impact of dietary fat composition on prediabetes: a 12-year follow-up study.

Pubmed ID: 28137328

Pubmed Central ID: PMC10261444

Journal: Public health nutrition

Publication Date: June 1, 2017

Affiliation: 4Department of Foods and Nutrition,University of Georgia,Athens,GA,USA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Maryland, North Carolina, Middle Aged, Longitudinal Studies, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Diet, Prospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Incidence, Socioeconomic Factors, Minnesota, Mississippi, Blood Glucose, Glucose Intolerance, Exercise, Prediabetic State, Dietary Fats, Surveys and Questionnaires, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Fatty Acids, Omega-6, Glucose Tolerance Test

Authors: Cooper JA, Steffen LM, Krishnan S, Paton CM

Cite As: Krishnan S, Steffen LM, Paton CM, Cooper JA. Impact of dietary fat composition on prediabetes: a 12-year follow-up study. Public Health Nutr 2017 Jun;20(9):1617-1626. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Studies:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dietary fatty acid composition likely affects prediabetic conditions such as isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT); however, this risk has not been evaluated in a large population nor has it been followed prospectively. DESIGN: Diet, physical activity, anthropometric, socio-economic and blood glucose data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were obtained from BioLINCC. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate associations of dietary SFA, MUFA, PUFA, n-3 fatty acid (FA) and n-6 FA intakes with incidence of one (isolated IFG) or two (IFG with IGT) prediabetic conditions at the end of 12-year follow-up. SETTING: Study volunteers were from counties in North Carolina, Mississippi, Minnesota and Maryland, USA. SUBJECTS: Data from 5288 volunteers who participated in the ARIC study were used for all analyses reported herein. RESULTS: The study population was 62% male and 84 % white, mean age 53·5 (sd 5·7) years and mean BMI 26·2 (sd 4·6) kg/m2. A moderately high intake of dietary MUFA (10-15 % of total daily energy) was associated with a 10 % reduced risk of isolated IFG incidence, while a high intake of n-3 FA (>0·15 % of total daily energy) was associated with a 10 % increase in risk. Curiously, moderately high intake of n-6 PUFA (4-5 % of total daily energy) was associated with a 12 % reduction in IFG and IGT incidence. CONCLUSIONS: MUFA, n-3 and n-6 FA contribute differently to the development of isolated IFG v. IFG with IGT; and their mechanism may be more complex than originally proposed.