Body Mass Index, Intensive Blood Pressure Management, and Cardiovascular Events in the SPRINT Trial.

Pubmed ID: 30721655

Journal: The American journal of medicine

Publication Date: July 1, 2019

Affiliation: Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: DLBHATTMD@POST.HARVARD.EDU.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension, Body Mass Index, Heart Failure, Blood Pressure, Stroke, Antihypertensive Agents

Authors: Olsen MH, Biering-Sørensen T, Bhatt DL, Vaduganathan M, Pareek M, Oxlund CS, Rasmussen BSB, Byrne C, Almarzooq Z

Cite As: Oxlund CS, Pareek M, Rasmussen BSB, Vaduganathan M, Biering-Sørensen T, Byrne C, Almarzooq Z, Olsen MH, Bhatt DL. Body Mass Index, Intensive Blood Pressure Management, and Cardiovascular Events in the SPRINT Trial. Am J Med 2019 Jul;132(7):840-846. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether intensive blood pressure management is well-tolerated and affects risk uniformly across the body mass index (BMI) spectrum. METHODS: The randomized, controlled Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) included 9361 individuals ≥50 years of age at high cardiovascular risk, without diabetes mellitus, with systolic blood pressure between 130 and 180 mmHg. Participants were randomized to intensive vs standard antihypertensive treatment and evaluated for the primary composite efficacy endpoint of acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death. The primary safety endpoint was serious adverse events. We used restricted cubic splines to determine the relationship between BMI, response to intensive blood pressure lowering, and clinical outcomes in SPRINT. RESULTS: Body mass index could be calculated for 9284 (99.2%) individuals. Mean BMI was similar between the 2 treatment groups (intensive group 29.9±5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> vs standard group 29.8± 5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; P = 0.39). Median follow-up was 3.3 years (range 0-4.8 years). Body mass index had a significant, J-shaped association with risk of all-cause mortality, stroke, and serious adverse events (P &lt; .05 for all), but these were no longer significant after accounting for key clinical factors (P &gt; .05 for all). Intensive blood pressure lowering reduced the primary efficacy endpoint and increased the primary safety endpoint compared with standard targets, consistently across the BMI spectrum (P<sub>interaction</sub> &gt; .05). CONCLUSION: The overall efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure lowering did not appear to be modified by baseline BMI among high-risk older adults.