Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Pubmed ID: 28379310

Pubmed Central ID: PMC5837728

Journal: European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging

Publication Date: July 1, 2017

Affiliation: Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Risk Assessment, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Prognosis, Comorbidity, Incidence, Stroke Volume, Double-Blind Method, Predictive Value of Tests, Echocardiography, Doppler, Internationality, Spironolactone

Grants: F32 HL134290

Authors: O'Neal WT, Soliman EZ, Patel N, Venkatesh S, Sandesara P, Hammadah M, Samman-Tahhan A, Kelli HM

Cite As: O'Neal WT, Sandesara P, Patel N, Venkatesh S, Samman-Tahhan A, Hammadah M, Kelli HM, Soliman EZ. Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017 Jul 1;18(7):725-729.

Studies:

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if markers of diastolic dysfunction are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) development among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association of several echocardiographic measures of diastolic dysfunction with incident AF in 573 patients (mean age = 68 ± 9.5 years; 48% men; 79% white) with HFpEF from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT) who were free of baseline AF. Echocardiograms were analysed at a core laboratory. Incident AF cases were identified by follow-up study electrocardiograms and review of relevant medical records through May of 2013. Over a median follow-up of 3 years, 40 patients developed AF (incidence rate = 2.2 per 100 person years). Increasing values of the E/A ratio [per 0.1 increase: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.17], left atrial volume (per 5 mL increase: HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.03-1.23), and left atrial area (per 5 cm2 increase: HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03-2.22) were associated with greater risk of AF. The risk of AF decreased with increasing peak A wave velocities (per 10 cm/s increase: HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72-0.96). The risk of AF was not materially altered when peak A wave velocity was further adjusted for left atrial volume (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.96) and area (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.96). However, the associations of left atrial volume (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.99-1.22) and area (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.96-2.28) were no longer significant when accounting for peak A wave velocity. CONCLUSION: Diastolic parameters of left atrial function possibly are more important markers of AF risk than left atrial dilation in HFpEF.