Efficacy of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with diabetes and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Pubmed ID: 30689020

Pubmed Central ID: PMC6652172

Journal: Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society

Publication Date: Aug. 1, 2019

Affiliation: British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK. john.mcmurray@glasgow.ac.uk.

Link: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00392-019-01415-z.pdf?link_time=2024-04-19_23:42:07.363984

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Risk Factors, Middle Aged, Heart Failure, Treatment Outcome, Cause of Death, Incidence, Survival Rate, Stroke Volume, Diabetes Mellitus, Vasodilator Agents, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable, United Kingdom, Amiodarone

Authors: Køber L, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, McMurray JJV, Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Dewan P

Cite As: Rørth R, Dewan P, Kristensen SL, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, Køber L, McMurray JJV. Efficacy of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with diabetes and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Clin Res Cardiol 2019 Aug;108(8):868-877. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

Studies:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and diabetes is not fully elucidated. METHODS: We examined the effect of ICD therapy on sudden cardiac death, cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality, according to diabetes status at baseline in the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT). The outcomes were analyzed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. RESULTS: Of the 1676 patients randomized to an ICD or placebo, 540 (32%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were slightly older (61 vs 58 years) and were more often in NYHA class III (37% vs 28%). ICD therapy did not reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in HFrEF patients with diabetes (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.52-1.40); even though these patients had a higher risk of sudden cardiac death compared to patients without diabetes (HR = 1.73 95% CI 1.22-2.47). By contrast, ICD therapy did reduce sudden cardiac death in HFrEF patients without diabetes (HR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.15-0.46); P<sub>interaction</sub>=0.002. The findings for cardiovascular and all-cause death were similar. CONCLUSION: ICD therapy did not reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death (or, as a consequence, all-cause death) in HFrEF patients with diabetes. Conversely, an ICD reduced the risk of sudden death in patients without diabetes, irrespective of etiology.