Effects of intensive glycemic control on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus are modified by long-term HbA<sub>1c</sub> variability: A post hoc analysis of the ACCORD trial.

Pubmed ID: 38246509

Journal: Diabetes research and clinical practice

Publication Date: Feb. 1, 2024

Affiliation: Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, MOE Key Laboratory of Geriatric Diseases and Immunology, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. Electronic address: gcchen@suda.edu.cn.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Risk Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Blood Glucose, Glycemic Control, Heart Disease Risk Factors, Retinal Diseases, Glycated Hemoglobin

Authors: Zheng Y, Wu XB, Wang JM, Miao MY, Jia YP, Wang XW, Wan ZX, Qin LQ, Li FR, Chen GC

Cite As: Wang JM, Miao MY, Jia YP, Wang XW, Wu XB, Wan ZX, Zheng Y, Qin LQ, Li FR, Chen GC. Effects of intensive glycemic control on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus are modified by long-term HbA1c variability: A post hoc analysis of the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2024 Feb;208:111100. Epub 2024 Jan 20.

Studies:

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the impact of long-term visit-to-visit variability in HbA<sub>1c</sub> on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and its influence on the effects of intensive glycemic control. METHODS: Included were participants with T2DM enrolled in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) who had at least three measurements of HbA<sub>1c</sub> prior to new-onset microvascular outcomes, namely nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy. Variability in HbA<sub>1c</sub> was defined as the coefficient of variation (CV) across HbA<sub>1c</sub> measurements obtained from enrollment to the transition from intensive to standard glycemic therapy. RESULTS: During a median of 22,005, 23,121, and 13,080 person-years of follow-up, 2,905 nephropathy, 2,655 retinopathy, and 1,974 neuropathy cases were recorded, respectively. Median CV (IQR) was 7.91 % (5.66 %-10.76 %) in the standard treatment group and 9.79 % (7.32 %-13.35 %) in the intensive treatment group. In the standard treatment group, lower HbA<sub>1c</sub>-CV (the first versus the second quartile) was associated with a higher risk of all microvascular outcomes, while higher HbA<sub>1c</sub>-CV (the fourth quartile) was associated with a higher risk of nephropathy only. In the intensive treatment group, only higher HbA<sub>1c</sub>-CV was associated with a higher risk of developing the microvascular outcomes. Intensive therapy reduced all microvascular outcomes among individuals with lower HbA<sub>1c</sub>-CV, but increased the risk among those with the highest HbA<sub>1c</sub>-CV (all P values for interaction &lt; 0.0001). For example, hazard ratios (95 % CI) of retinopathy comparing intensive with standard treatments were 0.65 (0.56-0.75), 0.84 (0.71-0.98), 0.97 (0.82-1.14) and 1.28 (1.08-1.53) across the lowest to the highest quartiles of HbA<sub>1c</sub> variability. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of intensive glycemic control on microvascular outcomes in T2DM appear to be modified by the variability of HbA<sub>1c</sub> during the treatment process, suggesting the significance of dynamic monitoring of HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels and timely adjustments to the therapeutic strategy among individuals with a high HbA<sub>1c</sub> variability.