Assessing risk for development of diabetes in young adults.

Pubmed ID: 17893384

Pubmed Central ID: PMC2000311

Journal: Annals of family medicine

Publication Date: Sept. 1, 2007

Affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Adolescent, Age Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment, Multivariate Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diabetes Mellitus, Racial Groups

Grants: 1 P30 AG21677, 1D12HP00023, P30 AG021677

Authors: Mainous AG, Diaz VA, Everett CJ

Cite As: Mainous AG 3rd, Diaz VA, Everett CJ. Assessing risk for development of diabetes in young adults. Ann Fam Med 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):425-9.

Studies:

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prevalence of diabetes is increasing to epidemic levels. A multivariable risk score for the development of diabetes has been shown to be predictive for middle-aged adults; however, it is unclear how well it performs in a younger adult population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a preexisting multivariable risk score for the development of diabetes in a young adult cohort. METHODS: We analyzed the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), a population-based observational study of participants aged 18 to 30 years recruited in 1985-1986. We observed individuals without diabetes at baseline for 10 years for the development of diabetes (n = 2,543). We computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for a diabetes risk score composed of the following 6 variables: elevated blood pressure, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, high triglyceride levels, body mass index, large waist circumference, and hyperglycemia. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was .70 in this population, which was less than the .78 previously found among middle-aged adults. BMI alone (.67) was not significantly different from the risk score. Blacks (.72; 95% CI, .69-.74) and whites (.68; 95% CI, .66-.71) do not significantly differ in the area under the ROC curve for the risk score; however, the area under the ROC curve for BMI is significantly larger for blacks (.69; 95% CI, .66-.72) than for whites (.63; 95% CI, .60-.65). CONCLUSION: An established risk score for the development of diabetes among middle-aged persons has limited utility in a younger population. Future research needs to focus on identifying novel factors that may improve the risk stratification for diabetes development among young adults.