Prognostic and diagnostic value of plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Pubmed ID: 23939353

Pubmed Central ID: PMC3812317

Journal: Critical care medicine

Publication Date: Nov. 1, 2013

Affiliation: 1Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 2Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 3Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 4Department of Anesthesia, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 5Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Adult, Female, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Comorbidity, Retrospective Studies, Hemodynamics, Respiratory Function Tests, APACHE, Biomarkers, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Grants: N01-HR-16146-54, R37 HL051856, N01 HR016146, R01 HL060710, HL084060, HL086667, HL60710, HL67197, K23 HL087934, N01-HR46046-64, R01 HL084060, R01 HL086667, K23 HL067197

Authors: Thompson BT, Matthay MA, Januzzi JL, Christiani DC, Bajwa EK, Volk JA, Harris RS

Cite As: Bajwa EK, Volk JA, Christiani DC, Harris RS, Matthay MA, Thompson BT, Januzzi JL, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Prognostic and diagnostic value of plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013 Nov;41(11):2521-31.

Studies:

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a biomarker of myocardial strain and inflammation. The characteristics of acute respiratory distress syndrome include inflammation and cardiovascular dysfunction. We sought to determine whether plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentration is associated with outcome and response to conservative fluid management and whether soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentration discriminates acute respiratory distress syndrome from decompensated heart failure. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial, a multi-center randomized controlled trial of conservative fluid management in the acute respiratory distress syndrome, as well as of a cohort of patients with decompensated heart failure. SETTING: Twenty acute care hospitals. PATIENTS: Eight hundred twenty-six patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and 209 patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nonsurvivors had higher day 0 (p < 0.0001) and day 3 (p < 0.0001) soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations. After adjustment for severity of illness, higher soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentration was associated with mortality, with odds ratioadj 1.47 (95% CI, 0.99-2.20; p = 0.06) at day 0, 2.94 (95% CI, 2.00-4.33; p < 0.0001) at day 3, and 3.63 (95% CI, 2.38-5.53; p < 0.0001) if soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 increased between days. Cumulative fluid balance was more positive among patients with higher day 0 (median, 5,212 mL [interquartile range, 200-12,284 mL] vs median, 2,020 mL [interquartile range, -2,034 to 7,091 mL]; p < 0.0001) and day 3 soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (median, 7,678 mL [interquartile range, 2,217-14,278 mL] vs median, 1,492 mL [interquartile range, -2,384 to 6,239 mL]; p < 0.0001). Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 showed excellent discriminative ability between the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial and heart failure populations (area under receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.98; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations are associated with worse outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome and may have value for discriminating acute respiratory distress syndrome from heart failure.